Adam-Troy Castro

Writer of Science Fiction, Fantasy, Horror, and Stories About Yams.

 

Story Excerpt: “Blurred Lives”

Posted on December 17th, 2017 by Adam-Troy Castro

The new Draiken story appears in the Jan/February 2018 ANALOG. Here, the first couple of pages:

Reunited after years of separation, the two old enemies Draiken and Thorne somehow refrain from killing one another and instead take to traveling together.

They are strange companions, neither strangers nor friends, occasional sex partners but not lovers.

The places they need to reach on this quest more important to him than to her, are neither travel hubs or capitols. Direct passage from here to there is often not quite possible. They must journey in segments, some difficult, some expensive, some downright illegal.

While enroute they spend much of their time in starship cargo holds, entombed in their bluegel crypts, fully unaware of the passage of time as their transports plow the twisted topology that interstellar travelers must use instead of straight lines.

By necessity they wake often, as they arrive at one interim port or another, to arrange the next legs of their journey. Some of these ports are once-green worlds now reduced to rancid industrial hells, while others are undeveloped backwaters that the give and take of civilized commerce have passed by. They stay a little while at one before moving on to another, at times treating these intervals as vacations, but more frequently taking them as maddening delays as they follow a circuitous route to one world, in particular.

Their adventures are numerous, their close calls profound. Books could be written about their more minor exploits.

Once upon a time they worked for different sides in a war where the allegiances kept changing, where momentary power shifts either rendered them precarious allies or required them to once again regard one another as targets. Now that circumstances have temporarily positioned them as allies again, they continue to stumble, often clumsily, between one state and the next. Draiken begins no day knowing for sure whether Thorne will be silent or voluble, cheerful or withdrawn to the point of hostility; whether she’ll pull him into her bed, or attempt to slit his throat. She does all these things, and yet somehow they survive: two intimate strangers, traveling together as man and wife, but living as feral dogs in a common cage.

More than once, during the peaceful interludes, she lies with her cheek against his chest. In one cover identity he has thick chest hair, which she explores with a fingertip, whispering that there are any number of congenial worlds that exist under bright and life-giving suns. There are places with blue water and warm breezes where the two of them could call themselves any name they choose and live in peace while waiting for the final darkness to take them. In such places, she says, they could pretend that the wars they’d known had never been fought, that the scars they’ve inflicted on one another have never been wounds spilling blood.

He reminds her that he’s tried this once on a world as beautiful as any. It didn’t work then. Even with nobody hunting him, he’d still lived with the furtiveness of any fugitive.

She points out that she hadn’t been with him then. Maybe, she supposes, if she ever followed him to a place like that, they could find shared peace in the fiction that none of the trespasses between them ever took place.

Maybe, he allows back. It would be nice.

The premise is dropped without resolution.

On multiple occasions she tries to kill him. On two of those, he needs to do her injury in order to protect himself. On the third, she inflicts what would be a mortal wound, but recoils at what she’s done and drags him to an AIsource Medical kiosk for emergency surgery.

Once, during weeks they spend aboard a slow-moving luxury transport, he wakes paralyzed, the victim of a neural tap she’s implanted on him during the night. She’s stripped and spread-eagled him, leaving him to stare face-up at a ceiling defined by horizontal support beams. She stretches out alongside him, the curves of her current body glowing in the overhead light, as she presses the tip of a dagger against the softest part of his throat. “You would be dead,” she assures him in a whisper as soft as the sound of leaves fluttering in breeze, “before it even began to occur to you that you were dying.” She draws the sharp edge across his skin, teasing the thin line between the natural resistance of the meat and the superior slicing capacity of the blade, not cutting but exploring the very border of his flesh giving way. Although he knows as well as she does just how long it would take a deep slash in any particular place to kill him, had in fact had the information drilled into him long before carrying out his first field operation, she amuses herself, for a while, telling him how his death would play out, were she to apply just a bit more pressure in any given place; less than twelve seconds here, a leisurely four minutes there, hours or days of helpless agony in this other place. She points out that, paralyzed as he is, he would not be able to address his wounds or cry for help, any more than he can talk her out of his murder now.

He can only wait and experience this as it happens, his mind finding occasional comfort in thoughts of that other, far gentler woman on Greeve. Aletha had offered him an alternative to resuming the madness of his old existence. She’d been willing to take him into her life, and to save him, as long as he returned the favor and also saved her. As he endures the insult of Thorne’s blade, he can only wonder whatever happened to that far gentler soul, whether she’d ever found anyone worthier of her than he had turned out to be. Or had he been her last chance of peace, just as she’d been his?

For the rest, check out the Jan/February 2018 ANALOG.

A 50-Year Old Sitcom Explodes The Excuse of “A Different Time”

Posted on December 1st, 2017 by Adam-Troy Castro

“You’ve got to understand. He comes from a different time. Standards were different.”

Well, here’s a thing.

One way to gauge the standards of a prior time is to take a look at its pop culture. See what assumptions it reflects.

You can discover all sorts of things. Like rape as a way to handle a recalcitrant wife in GONE WITH THE WIND. Or racial slurs in any number of outlets, from sympathetic characters.

And what is one of the earliest TV shows about the working life of a professional woman?

THE MARY TYLER MOORE SHOW.

And as it happens, though I haven’t seen it in years, I clearly remember the plot of the first episode of THE MARY TYLER SHOW, among with much of the dialogue.

In that episode, Mary Richards shows up at a TV station to apply for a job as a secretary. She gets an interview with Lou Grant, a formidable figure of a boss who kind of terrifies her with his gruffness (at one point memorably barking, “I hate spunk!”), and ends up giving her a better job than the one she applied for, one she protests that she’s not qualified for.

Later, she is at home minding her own business when the doorbell rings and it turns out to be him, drunk. All of a sudden the results of the job interview make sense to her. She is angry and betrayed and she wholly rejects what she thinks he wants of her.

It turns out that he has no sexual expectations of her, that he’s just at odds, and looking for a sympathetic ear. His arrival this early in their professional relationship is still a trespass, assuming friendship that does not yet exist, and it’s the act of a drunken oaf. But it’s a much more benign trespass than expecting sexual availability, a sexual quid pro quo for the great new job. He wants to use her typewriter to write a letter to his absent wife.

The scene exists to establish their relationship. He expected nothing sexual from her. He’s a teddy bear. Soon to be one of her best friends.

He still stepped over “the line,” but a more innocent line.

Let us just say, of these two characters who will soon be able to show up at one another’s homes at a moment’s notice to solve their sitcom problem, an early manifestation of a friendship that had not blossomed yet. Very soon, it would be okay.

But look: the actual sexual harassment line was still there, and was invoked in Mary’s initial reaction.

The show recognized that there was a line of that sort.

The show established that if he had wanted the other thing, in these circumstances, he would have been a scumbag.

That it also established that his intrusion was innocent, is immaterial.

She was allowed to get angry. She was allowed to get disgusted. She was allowed to be aware that this was something that sometimes happened, and to reject it.

The show aired in the Fall of 1970.

47 years ago.

Adults wrote the show. THEN.

“It was a different time” is no excuse.

Our Time Answered The Question, “What If Ted Baxter Were Evil?”

Posted on November 28th, 2017 by Adam-Troy Castro

One interesting thing about anchorman Ted Baxter, from the old MARY TYLER MOORE SHOW, is that he was objectively a bad person.

Oh, the show kept finding ways to redeem him, because you didn’t have unredeemable assholes as regular characters in those days. You were supposed to be affectionately aggravated by him, but not to actively loathe him.

However, it’s not unfair to call him a bad person. He was astonishingly vain and selfish, he committed little sins from theft to outright lying, and he actually, literally, sexually harassed Mary, a sin that was wrapped up and forgiven at the end of 24 minutes, with his recognition that he’d done a bad thing and his concrete action to make amends. But we would be much less likely to smile about today.

Sure, “he had a good heart.” And we were encouraged to love him, despite himself, not hard to do when the show actively wanted us to like him, and Ted Knight was playing him. But even in those cases where that good heart manifested, his instincts first led him in the wrong direction. And those moments where he showed humanity first, his love of his children for instance, do not redeem all the moments when he must have caused real damage, with his selfishness and venality. A wholly evil person? Probably not. A bad person? Absolutely, and his terrible qualities were not minimized by his ignorance and idiocy.

Of course, Ted Baxter was only the news anchorman on a third-rate channel that almost nobody watched. His power to wound was largely limited to his closest associates.

Now give Ted Baxter power. Give him a vast following of people who want to explain away his every gaffe, either by excusing them or claiming them to be distortions. Make sure that he is fed a steady diet of bullshit to regurgitate and be aware that he will do just that, because he cannot tell the difference.

What damage he will do!

But he is still Ted Baxter, the guy so offensively stupid that he will make a Pocahontas joke to native Americans. Again, because he doesn’t know any better, and because he doesn’t have a Lou Grant anywhere in his circle, to regularly take the piss out of him. Imagine how much worse the Ted Baxter of THE MARY TYLER MOORE SHOW would be if he did not have Lou Grant as his boss, Murray as a sardonic co-worker, Mary Richards as the lady whose regard he actually values! Imagine he never received push-back, if he only had people who approved of him, unconditionally!

Can you imagine what Ted Baxter would be like, then?

Now put all that together, and posit one last, horrifying condition.

Imagine that Ted Baxter were not just a bad person, but an actively evil one. One whose empathy was not asleep, but dead. One whose malice knew no bounds.

Kind of terrifying, isn’t it?

 
 
 

Copyright © 2011 Adam-Troy Castro Designed by Brandy Hauman